
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>A Plain English Introduction to EA -- Peter Murchland</title>
<link>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=617206</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 02:49:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:56:59 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2013 Association of Enterprise Architects</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.globalaea.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=617206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>A Plain English Introduction to EA -- Peter Murchland</title>
<link>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=617206</link>
<guid>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=617206</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Discuss Peter Murchland's article "A Plain English Introduction to Enterprise Architecture".</p><p></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:04:21 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Up with Plain English</title>
<link>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=659422</link>
<guid>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=659422</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>These words rang true to me! I've thought for a long time that (some) enterprise architects seem to be trying to gain credibility by layering on the technical jargon, borrowed it seems from engineering and computer science, to disguise the fact that what we do is often common sense. &nbsp;We should embrace that fact, not hide it.</p><p>&nbsp;I even had one irate attendee at a conference rise up in high dudgeon and accuse me of peddling "nothing more than good systems engineering." &nbsp;Well, yes.</p><p>So, keep on keeping on with the clear language and clear purpose!</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Kathie Sowell</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:56:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
