
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>EA Research: GenAI to support Capability Maturity Assessment</title>
<link>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1836521</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 23:02:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:36:43 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2025 Association of Enterprise Architects</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.globalaea.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1836521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>EA Research: GenAI to support Capability Maturity Assessment</title>
<link>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1836521</link>
<guid>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1836521</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">Good day,
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">I am contacting fellow Enterprise Architecture practitioners to request approximately ten minutes of your time to share your experience and perspective.
I am currently undertaking a research project with The Open University (UK) examining the feasibility of applying Generative AI to automate Business Capability Maturity Assessments and improve strategic execution. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">As part of this study, I am gathering practitioner insights to understand current practices, challenges, and views on AI-enabled assessment.
If you are willing to contribute, I would greatly appreciate your participation in a short questionnaire of around twenty questions: </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">👉 Survey link: <a href="https://forms.cloud.microsoft/r/M8arm5tckD" target="_blank"><strong>https://forms.cloud.microsoft/r/M8arm5tckD</strong></a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">
Your professional insight would be extremely valuable, and all responses are anonymous.
Thank you in advance for considering this contribution to the EA community. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: medium;">Kind regards, <br />
</span><span style="font-size: medium;">Ralfe Poisson</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 10:12:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1837091</link>
<guid>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1837091</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Ralfe, Thanks for your post. I would like to have a call to discuss how the AEA can help with this. I will be contacting you. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1837220</link>
<guid>https://www.globalaea.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1837220</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">Hi Ralfe, Hi All , The assessment is a great initiative. <br />
I happened to come across an interesting article on that subject <br />
Summarized:  <br />
Impact and Implications of Generative AI for Enterprise Architects in Agile Environments: A Systematic Literature Review<br />
<br />
Link: <strong><a href="https://arxiv.org/html/2510.22003v1" target="_blank">https://arxiv.org/html/2510.22003v1</a></strong><br />
<br />
1. Core Opportunities of GenAI in EA<br />
•	Artifact generation: Automates code, models, diagrams, and documentation → reduces cycle time and supports agile sprints.<br />
•	Design ideation: Rapid exploration of architectural alternatives → helps balance scalability, performance, and maintainability.<br />
•	Decision support: Scenario simulation and trade-off analysis → strengthens architects’ advisory role in complex environments.<br />
•	Knowledge retrieval: Organizes architectural knowledge and requirements → improves stakeholder communication and alignment.<br />
Practical takeaway: EA teams can embed GenAI into modeling tools and documentation workflows to accelerate delivery while maintaining traceability.<br />
<br />
2. Risks and Constraints<br />
•	Opacity (“black box”): Limits explainability and governance.<br />
•	Bias &amp; hallucinations: Outputs may be contextually wrong, requiring rework.<br />
•	Compliance concerns: Privacy and regulatory risks when handling sensitive data.<br />
•	Skill erosion: Over-reliance may weaken architects’ analytical judgment.<br />
•	Scalability limits: Context windows restrict large-scale enterprise modeling.<br />
Practical takeaway: Always validate GenAI outputs with human oversight, embed audit trails, and enforce compliance checks before adoption.<br />
<br />
3. Evolving Role of the Architect<br />
•	Shift from creator → curator/validator of AI outputs.<br />
•	New competencies: <br />
o	Prompt engineering (designing effective queries)<br />
o	Model evaluation (assessing reliability and bias)<br />
o	Governance oversight (ensuring ethical and compliant use)<br />
•	Expanded roles: strategic advisor, technical coach, crisis manager, and facilitator across agile teams.<br />
Practical takeaway: EA leaders should invest in training architects on AI literacy, governance, and oversight skills.<br />
<br />
4. Organizational Enablers<br />
•	Education &amp; upskilling: Prompt engineering, GenAI evaluation, responsible AI use.<br />
•	Governance maturity: Policies, ethical oversight, traceability mechanisms.<br />
•	Readiness domains: Infrastructure, skilled personnel, data governance, legal compliance, strategic alignment.<br />
•	Culture: Avoid “social loafing” (over-reliance on AI) by fostering accountability.<br />
Practical takeaway: Build a GenAI adoption roadmap that combines technical readiness with governance frameworks and cultural adaptation.<br />
<br />
5. Adaptations Required<br />
•	Dynamic governance frameworks: Iterative, evolving with model performance and regulation.<br />
•	Data-handling protocols: Privacy-preserving measures, audit trails, compliance with standards (e.g., GDPR).<br />
•	Trust-building: Transparent communication, responsible usage guidelines, stakeholder engagement.<br />
Practical takeaway: EA offices should integrate GenAI governance into existing frameworks (TOGAF, SAFe) and establish clear accountability structures.<br />
<br />
Final Practical Guidance for EA<br />
•	Use GenAI for speed and ideation, but never delegate final judgment.<br />
•	Treat architects as human-AI orchestrators, ensuring alignment with enterprise strategy.<br />
•	Build capability stacks: technical (tools), organizational (governance), and human (skills).<br />
•	Focus on responsible experimentation: pilot GenAI in low-risk areas, scale with governance maturity.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 12:36:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
